RiskDesk · Free Tool

Profit Factor Calculator

Calculate a strategy’s profit factor from its win rate, average win and average loss, with trading costs taken out, and see how much room the edge really has.

Profit factor after costs —
Gross profit—
Gross loss—
Net profit—
Expectancy—
Payoff ratio after costs—
Breakeven win rate—

Educational tool only. Results describe the averages you enter; a profit factor measured on past trades says nothing certain about future ones. Nothing here is financial or investment advice.

What profit factor measures

Profit factor is the money a strategy made on its winning trades divided by the money it lost on its losing ones:

profit factor = gross profit ÷ gross loss

A profit factor of 1.0 means the strategy broke even. Above 1.0 it made money: 1.5 means it made $1.50 for every $1.00 it lost. Below 1.0 it lost money. Because it is a ratio, it compares strategies of different sizes and account currencies directly.

It can also be built from averages, which is what this calculator does: gross profit is the number of winners times the average win, gross loss the number of losers times the average loss. That form shows the two levers behind the number, win rate and payoff ratio.

A worked example, with costs

The figures loaded above describe 200 trades with a 45% win rate, an average win of $300 and an average loss of $150. Before costs, the profit factor is 90 × $300 ÷ (110 × $150) = 1.64.

Now add $10 a trade in commission and slippage. Every winner shrinks to $290 and every loser grows to $160. Gross profit falls to $26,100, gross loss rises to $17,600, and the profit factor drops to 1.48. Net profit is $8,500, or +$42.50 a trade.

A $10 cost on a $150 risk looks trivial, yet it removed about a tenth of the profit factor. The tighter the stop relative to costs, the bigger the effect, which is why scalping strategies that look excellent before costs often fall below 1.0 after them. Always judge profit factor after costs.

What is a good profit factor?

  • Below 1.0: the strategy loses money.
  • 1.0 to about 1.2: marginal. A small rise in costs or a slightly worse market can erase it.
  • About 1.3 to 2.0: where most durable strategies sit after costs.
  • Above about 3: treat with suspicion unless the sample is large. Very high figures usually come from too few trades, a curve-fitted backtest or a period that suited the strategy unusually well.

Those bands are rules of thumb, not thresholds. A trend-following system with a 35% win rate and large winners and a mean-reversion system with a 70% win rate can share the same profit factor and behave nothing alike.

Profit factor versus expectancy

Profit factor says how efficiently a strategy turns losses into gains. It does not say how much it makes per trade or how many trades it took. Two strategies with a profit factor of 1.5 can have very different expectancies, and a profit factor from 20 trades is far less reliable than the same figure from 500. Use it alongside expectancy and sample size; the expectancy calculator computes all three from a list of your trade results, and the risk-reward calculator shows the win rate each payoff ratio needs to break even.

Profit factor by setup, not just in total.

RiskDesk’s journal breaks profit factor, expectancy and win rate down by setup, market state, weekday and hour, so you can see which parts of a strategy carry it and which drag it down.

Frequently asked questions

How do you calculate profit factor?

Divide gross profit by gross loss. Gross profit is the total of all winning trades; gross loss is the total of all losing trades, taken as a positive number. With a 45% win rate, a $300 average win and a $150 average loss over 200 trades, profit factor is (90 x 300) / (110 x 150) = 1.64 before costs.

What is a good profit factor in trading?

After costs, most durable strategies sit roughly between 1.3 and 2.0. Between 1.0 and 1.2 there is little margin for error. Figures above about 3 usually point to a small sample or an over-fitted backtest rather than a lasting edge.

What does a profit factor below 1 mean?

It means the strategy lost more on its losing trades than it made on its winners over the period measured, so it lost money overall.

Is profit factor better than win rate?

It is more informative, because it combines win rate with the size of wins and losses. A 30% win rate can produce a high profit factor if winners are large, and a 70% win rate can produce a profit factor below 1 if losers are much bigger than winners.

Should profit factor include commissions?

Yes. Costs reduce every winner and enlarge every loser, so they lower profit factor more than their size suggests, especially for strategies with tight stops. Judge a strategy on its profit factor after commission, fees and slippage.