RiskDesk · Free Tool

Average Down Calculator

Work out your new average cost after buying more of a falling position, how many shares a target average needs, and what averaging down does to your loss if the stop is hit.

What you hold

What you might add

New average cost —
Total shares and cost—
Rise needed to break even—
Shares needed for target average—
Loss if stop is hit—

Educational tool only. Fees are applied per trade as you enter them; taxes are not modelled. Nothing here is financial or investment advice.

How averaging down works

Averaging down means buying more of a position that has fallen, which lowers the average price you paid per share. The arithmetic is a weighted average:

new average = (shares held × average cost + shares bought × price + fees) ÷ total shares
shares for a target average = shares held × (average cost − target) ÷ (target − price)

A worked example

With the figures loaded above you hold 100 shares bought at $50, and the price is now $40.

  • Buying another 100 at $40 takes the average cost to $45 on 200 shares, $9,000 in total.
  • The shares now need to rise from $40 to $45, 12.5%, to break even, instead of 25% back to $50.
  • To reach a $46 average you would need 100 × ($50 − $46) ÷ ($46 − $40) = 66.7, so 67 shares.

What averaging down does to risk

This is the part most average-down calculators leave out. Say the stop is $36.

  • Holding 100 shares, a stop at $36 loses 100 × ($50 − $36) = $1,400.
  • Holding 200 shares at a $45 average, the same stop loses 200 × ($45 − $36) = $1,800.

Averaging down added $400 of risk, the new 100 shares times the $4 between today’s price and the stop. The break-even moved closer, but the position got bigger in exactly the trade that is going wrong. That is why averaging down is a sizing decision, not a recovery plan.

When not to average down

  • If the reason for the trade has changed. A lower price is only cheaper if the business, or the setup, is unchanged.
  • If the extra risk breaks your rules. If the loss at the stop would exceed your risk per trade, the position is too big. The position size calculator gives the size your risk allows.
  • Without a stop at all. Averaging down without a level at which you are wrong has no ceiling on how much it can lose. The stop loss guide covers where to put one.
  • With leverage. Margin magnifies both the extra size and the risk of a forced sale at the low.

Planned scaling in, deciding in advance to buy in two or three tranches with the total size and stop fixed, is a different thing from adding because a trade hurts. The first is a plan. See how deep holes become with the drawdown recovery calculator.

Decide the stop before the second buy.

RiskDesk sizes each entry from your stop and risk per trade and checks it against your own rules, including a cap on open positions and correlated exposure, before you add.

Frequently asked questions

How do you calculate average cost after averaging down?

Add the cost of the shares you hold to the cost of the new shares, including fees, and divide by the total number of shares. 100 at $50 plus 100 at $40 averages $45.

How many shares do I need to buy to lower my average?

Shares held times (current average minus target average), divided by (target average minus current price). From 100 at $50 to a $46 average at $40 needs about 67 shares.

Is averaging down a good strategy?

It lowers the break-even but increases the position in a trade that is losing. It only makes sense if the original reason for the trade still holds and the larger loss at your stop is within your risk limit.

Does averaging down increase risk?

Yes. The loss if your stop is hit grows by the new shares times the distance from today's price to the stop. In the example it rises from $1,400 to $1,800.

What is the difference between averaging down and scaling in?

Scaling in is a plan made before the trade, with the total size and stop fixed in advance. Averaging down is usually a reaction to a loss, which is when position size tends to drift.